<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Intermap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://intermap.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://intermap.org</link>
	<description>International Media Argument Project : Political Communication, Rhetoric and Public Diplomacy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:04:33 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on In the interest of informed debate by Tweets that mention In the interest of informed debate - Intermap -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://intermap.org/2010/07/20/in-the-interest-of-informed-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-40006</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention In the interest of informed debate - Intermap -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intermap.org/?p=293#comment-40006</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by abuaardvark, Nichole A.. Nichole A. said: RT @abuaardvark: Hayden: the academic/policy debate, this time in PD http://bit.ly/cpQInG smarter than the silly piece he&#039;s commenting on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by abuaardvark, Nichole A.. Nichole A. said: RT @abuaardvark: Hayden: the academic/policy debate, this time in PD <a href="http://bit.ly/cpQInG" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/cpQInG</a> smarter than the silly piece he&#039;s commenting on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Twitter credibility by Integrating PD2.0 &#171; Public Diplomacy, Networks and Influence</title>
		<link>http://intermap.org/2010/07/06/twitter-credibility/comment-page-1/#comment-40005</link>
		<dc:creator>Integrating PD2.0 &#171; Public Diplomacy, Networks and Influence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intermap.org/?p=291#comment-40005</guid>
		<description>[...] Public Diplomacy, Networks and Influence     &#171; How Strategic Can Diplomacy&#160;Be?    Integrating&#160;PD2.0 July 15, 2010   In the last week or so there have been kerfuffles about the blogging British ambassadors and the twitterific cake eating Americans. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Public Diplomacy, Networks and Influence     &laquo; How Strategic Can Diplomacy&nbsp;Be?    Integrating&nbsp;PD2.0 July 15, 2010   In the last week or so there have been kerfuffles about the blogging British ambassadors and the twitterific cake eating Americans. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Twitter credibility by Crisis Assistance : : July 7-9 - Cancer Health Center</title>
		<link>http://intermap.org/2010/07/06/twitter-credibility/comment-page-1/#comment-40004</link>
		<dc:creator>Crisis Assistance : : July 7-9 - Cancer Health Center</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 22:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intermap.org/?p=291#comment-40004</guid>
		<description>[...] Twitter credibility &#8211; Intermap: Social media like Twitter and facebook are not just other vehicles to address target audiences; touchpoints in a slick marketing campaign. They are means by which the State Department can be rendered something other than a monolithic voice of the US government. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Twitter credibility &#8211; Intermap: Social media like Twitter and facebook are not just other vehicles to address target audiences; touchpoints in a slick marketing campaign. They are means by which the State Department can be rendered something other than a monolithic voice of the US government. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What&#8217;s new about New Media and Persuasion? by Tweets that mention What’s new about New Media and Persuasion? - Intermap -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://intermap.org/2008/08/14/whats-new-about-new-media-and-persuasion/comment-page-1/#comment-40003</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention What’s new about New Media and Persuasion? - Intermap -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 18:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intermap.org/?p=32#comment-40003</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by John Allen Bell, John Allen Bell. John Allen Bell said: http://intermap.org/2008/08/14/whats-new-about-new-media-and-persuasion/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by John Allen Bell, John Allen Bell. John Allen Bell said: <a href="http://intermap.org/2008/08/14/whats-new-about-new-media-and-persuasion/" rel="nofollow">http://intermap.org/2008/08/14/whats-new-about-new-media-and-persuasion/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Labels and Credibility by Intermap on Cultural Relations vs PD &#171; Public Diplomacy, Networks and Influence</title>
		<link>http://intermap.org/2010/04/15/labels-and-credibility/comment-page-1/#comment-40001</link>
		<dc:creator>Intermap on Cultural Relations vs PD &#171; Public Diplomacy, Networks and Influence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 12:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intermap.org/?p=283#comment-40001</guid>
		<description>[...] Over at Intermap Craig Hayden reports on a visit to the Confucious Institute at the University of Maryland.  His [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Over at Intermap Craig Hayden reports on a visit to the Confucious Institute at the University of Maryland.  His [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on More on the US Public Diplomacy Framework: Concept and Structure by Tweets that mention More the US Public Diplomacy Framework: Concept and Structure - Intermap -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://intermap.org/2010/04/02/more-the-us-public-diplomacy-framework-concept-and-structure/comment-page-1/#comment-39994</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention More the US Public Diplomacy Framework: Concept and Structure - Intermap -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 04:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intermap.org/?p=263#comment-39994</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by USC Public Diplomacy, daninfowar. daninfowar said: RT @PublicDiplomacy: [Today in PD] More the US Public Diplomacy Framework: Concept and Structure http://bit.ly/drTbbA [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by USC Public Diplomacy, daninfowar. daninfowar said: RT @PublicDiplomacy: [Today in PD] More the US Public Diplomacy Framework: Concept and Structure <a href="http://bit.ly/drTbbA" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/drTbbA</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Conversation on Media Technology and Diplomacy by Tweets that mention A Conversation on Media Technology and Diplomacy - Intermap -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://intermap.org/2010/04/02/a-conversation-on-media-technology-and-diplomacy/comment-page-1/#comment-39989</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention A Conversation on Media Technology and Diplomacy - Intermap -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 23:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intermap.org/?p=273#comment-39989</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by abuaardvark, techise . techise said: A Conversation on Media Technology and Diplomacy - Intermap http://bit.ly/cEL2R8 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by abuaardvark, techise . techise said: A Conversation on Media Technology and Diplomacy &#8211; Intermap <a href="http://bit.ly/cEL2R8" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/cEL2R8</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Public Diplomacy debates reflect bigger IR questions by Reader Response: Donna Oglesby - Intermap</title>
		<link>http://intermap.org/2009/10/28/public-diplomacy-debates-reflect-bigger-ir-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-39986</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader Response: Donna Oglesby - Intermap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 00:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intermap.org/?p=226#comment-39986</guid>
		<description>[...] Service Officer (USIA) and Diplomat in Residence at Eckerd College, had this to say about &#8220;Public Diplomacy Debate Reflects Bigger IR Questions&#8220;:  Following Steve Corman’s tip to look at the astrological alignments that govern [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Service Officer (USIA) and Diplomat in Residence at Eckerd College, had this to say about &#8220;Public Diplomacy Debate Reflects Bigger IR Questions&#8220;:  Following Steve Corman’s tip to look at the astrological alignments that govern [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Public Diplomacy debates reflect bigger IR questions by COMOPS Journal &#187; Strange Annual Cycle in PD/SC Definition Debates?</title>
		<link>http://intermap.org/2009/10/28/public-diplomacy-debates-reflect-bigger-ir-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-39980</link>
		<dc:creator>COMOPS Journal &#187; Strange Annual Cycle in PD/SC Definition Debates?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intermap.org/?p=226#comment-39980</guid>
		<description>[...] A debate has once again re-ignited over the relative meaning of Public Diplomacy and Strategic Communication, sparked this time by a keynote by Bruce Gregory at GWU on October 5.  It was rejoined by Amb. William Rugh in an email exchange with Bruce, both of whose comments were posted and re-rejoined by Craig Hayden. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A debate has once again re-ignited over the relative meaning of Public Diplomacy and Strategic Communication, sparked this time by a keynote by Bruce Gregory at GWU on October 5.  It was rejoined by Amb. William Rugh in an email exchange with Bruce, both of whose comments were posted and re-rejoined by Craig Hayden. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Public Diplomacy debates reflect bigger IR questions by Tweets that mention Intermap » Public Diplomacy debates reflect bigger IR questions -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://intermap.org/2009/10/28/public-diplomacy-debates-reflect-bigger-ir-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-39979</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Intermap » Public Diplomacy debates reflect bigger IR questions -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intermap.org/?p=226#comment-39979</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by USC Public Diplomacy, SU Public Diplomacy. SU Public Diplomacy said: [PD Now] Public Diplomacy debates reflect bigger IR questions http://bit.ly/114OIV [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by USC Public Diplomacy, SU Public Diplomacy. SU Public Diplomacy said: [PD Now] Public Diplomacy debates reflect bigger IR questions <a href="http://bit.ly/114OIV" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/114OIV</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
