<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Intermap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://intermap.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://intermap.org</link>
	<description>International Media Argument Project : Political Communication, Rhetoric and Public Diplomacy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 10:38:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Strengthening IIP: Providing Content that Matters by Tweets that mention Strengthening IIP: Providing Content that Matters - Intermap -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://intermap.org/2011/02/04/strengthening-iip-providing-content-that-matters/comment-page-1/#comment-40019</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Strengthening IIP: Providing Content that Matters - Intermap -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 10:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intermap.org/?p=315#comment-40019</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Marta J. Viñes, Dan Sreebny. Dan Sreebny said: AU&#039;s Craig Hayden has interesting post on changes in #IIP bureau at http://goo.gl/dWh4L. #publicdiplomacy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Marta J. Viñes, Dan Sreebny. Dan Sreebny said: AU&#039;s Craig Hayden has interesting post on changes in #IIP bureau at <a href="http://goo.gl/dWh4L" rel="nofollow">http://goo.gl/dWh4L</a>. #publicdiplomacy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Assessing the Public Diplomacy Assessment Model Report by PD-MAP and Political Realism &#171; Public Diplomacy, Networks and Influence</title>
		<link>http://intermap.org/2010/10/15/assessing-the-public-diplomacy-assessment-model-report/comment-page-1/#comment-40016</link>
		<dc:creator>PD-MAP and Political Realism &#171; Public Diplomacy, Networks and Influence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 07:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intermap.org/?p=298#comment-40016</guid>
		<description>[...] Armstrong and Craig Hayden have both weighed in on the  LBJ School PD-MAP paper on evaluation in US public diplomacy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Armstrong and Craig Hayden have both weighed in on the  LBJ School PD-MAP paper on evaluation in US public diplomacy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Senator Jim Webb reads blogs? by La nuova propaganda del Pentagono in Iraq &#124; VOX CLAMANTIS</title>
		<link>http://intermap.org/2008/10/11/senator-jim-webb-reads-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-40008</link>
		<dc:creator>La nuova propaganda del Pentagono in Iraq &#124; VOX CLAMANTIS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intermap.org/?p=46#comment-40008</guid>
		<description>[...] specialisti di ‘public diplomacy’ sono anch’essi rimasti sconcertati dalla missione di indottrinamento di Gates. Un noto esperto mi ha scritto tramite e-mail: “La [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] specialisti di ‘public diplomacy’ sono anch’essi rimasti sconcertati dalla missione di indottrinamento di Gates. Un noto esperto mi ha scritto tramite e-mail: “La [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Public Diplomacy and the Phantom Menace of Theory by Public Diplomacy Scholars and Practitioners: Thoughts For An Ongoing Conversation &#124; Exchange</title>
		<link>http://intermap.org/2009/05/19/public-diplomacy-and-the-phantom-menace-of-theory/comment-page-1/#comment-40007</link>
		<dc:creator>Public Diplomacy Scholars and Practitioners: Thoughts For An Ongoing Conversation &#124; Exchange</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2010 16:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intermap.org/?p=173#comment-40007</guid>
		<description>[...] [viii] Craig Hayden, “Public Diplomacy and the Phantom Menace of Theory,” Intermap blog, May 19, 2009, http://intermap.org/2009/05/19/public-diplomacy-and-the-phantom-menace-of-theory/. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [viii] Craig Hayden, “Public Diplomacy and the Phantom Menace of Theory,” Intermap blog, May 19, 2009, <a href="http://intermap.org/2009/05/19/public-diplomacy-and-the-phantom-menace-of-theory/" rel="nofollow">http://intermap.org/2009/05/19/public-diplomacy-and-the-phantom-menace-of-theory/</a>. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on In the interest of informed debate by Tweets that mention In the interest of informed debate - Intermap -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://intermap.org/2010/07/20/in-the-interest-of-informed-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-40006</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention In the interest of informed debate - Intermap -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intermap.org/?p=293#comment-40006</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by abuaardvark, Nichole A.. Nichole A. said: RT @abuaardvark: Hayden: the academic/policy debate, this time in PD http://bit.ly/cpQInG smarter than the silly piece he&#039;s commenting on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by abuaardvark, Nichole A.. Nichole A. said: RT @abuaardvark: Hayden: the academic/policy debate, this time in PD <a href="http://bit.ly/cpQInG" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/cpQInG</a> smarter than the silly piece he&#039;s commenting on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Twitter credibility by Integrating PD2.0 &#171; Public Diplomacy, Networks and Influence</title>
		<link>http://intermap.org/2010/07/06/twitter-credibility/comment-page-1/#comment-40005</link>
		<dc:creator>Integrating PD2.0 &#171; Public Diplomacy, Networks and Influence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intermap.org/?p=291#comment-40005</guid>
		<description>[...] Public Diplomacy, Networks and Influence     &#171; How Strategic Can Diplomacy&#160;Be?    Integrating&#160;PD2.0 July 15, 2010   In the last week or so there have been kerfuffles about the blogging British ambassadors and the twitterific cake eating Americans. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Public Diplomacy, Networks and Influence     &laquo; How Strategic Can Diplomacy&nbsp;Be?    Integrating&nbsp;PD2.0 July 15, 2010   In the last week or so there have been kerfuffles about the blogging British ambassadors and the twitterific cake eating Americans. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Twitter credibility by Crisis Assistance : : July 7-9 - Cancer Health Center</title>
		<link>http://intermap.org/2010/07/06/twitter-credibility/comment-page-1/#comment-40004</link>
		<dc:creator>Crisis Assistance : : July 7-9 - Cancer Health Center</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 22:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intermap.org/?p=291#comment-40004</guid>
		<description>[...] Twitter credibility &#8211; Intermap: Social media like Twitter and facebook are not just other vehicles to address target audiences; touchpoints in a slick marketing campaign. They are means by which the State Department can be rendered something other than a monolithic voice of the US government. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Twitter credibility &#8211; Intermap: Social media like Twitter and facebook are not just other vehicles to address target audiences; touchpoints in a slick marketing campaign. They are means by which the State Department can be rendered something other than a monolithic voice of the US government. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What&#8217;s new about New Media and Persuasion? by Tweets that mention What’s new about New Media and Persuasion? - Intermap -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://intermap.org/2008/08/14/whats-new-about-new-media-and-persuasion/comment-page-1/#comment-40003</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention What’s new about New Media and Persuasion? - Intermap -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 18:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intermap.org/?p=32#comment-40003</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by John Allen Bell, John Allen Bell. John Allen Bell said: http://intermap.org/2008/08/14/whats-new-about-new-media-and-persuasion/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by John Allen Bell, John Allen Bell. John Allen Bell said: <a href="http://intermap.org/2008/08/14/whats-new-about-new-media-and-persuasion/" rel="nofollow">http://intermap.org/2008/08/14/whats-new-about-new-media-and-persuasion/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Labels and Credibility by Intermap on Cultural Relations vs PD &#171; Public Diplomacy, Networks and Influence</title>
		<link>http://intermap.org/2010/04/15/labels-and-credibility/comment-page-1/#comment-40001</link>
		<dc:creator>Intermap on Cultural Relations vs PD &#171; Public Diplomacy, Networks and Influence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 12:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intermap.org/?p=283#comment-40001</guid>
		<description>[...] Over at Intermap Craig Hayden reports on a visit to the Confucious Institute at the University of Maryland.  His [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Over at Intermap Craig Hayden reports on a visit to the Confucious Institute at the University of Maryland.  His [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on More on the US Public Diplomacy Framework: Concept and Structure by Tweets that mention More the US Public Diplomacy Framework: Concept and Structure - Intermap -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://intermap.org/2010/04/02/more-the-us-public-diplomacy-framework-concept-and-structure/comment-page-1/#comment-39994</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention More the US Public Diplomacy Framework: Concept and Structure - Intermap -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 04:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intermap.org/?p=263#comment-39994</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by USC Public Diplomacy, daninfowar. daninfowar said: RT @PublicDiplomacy: [Today in PD] More the US Public Diplomacy Framework: Concept and Structure http://bit.ly/drTbbA [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by USC Public Diplomacy, daninfowar. daninfowar said: RT @PublicDiplomacy: [Today in PD] More the US Public Diplomacy Framework: Concept and Structure <a href="http://bit.ly/drTbbA" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/drTbbA</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

