<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Logic of Indirection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://intermap.org/2008/12/04/the-logic-of-indirection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://intermap.org/2008/12/04/the-logic-of-indirection/</link>
	<description>International Media Argument Project : Political Communication, Rhetoric and Public Diplomacy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 10:38:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Intermap &#187; Talking about Soft Power</title>
		<link>http://intermap.org/2008/12/04/the-logic-of-indirection/comment-page-1/#comment-39511</link>
		<dc:creator>Intermap &#187; Talking about Soft Power</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 18:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intermap.org/?p=61#comment-39511</guid>
		<description>[...] diplomacy 2.0” quite plainly shifts the balance away from short-term instrumentality. As I blogged about previously – in public diplomacy 2.0, the U.S. plays the role of facilitator and convener. The U.S. is a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] diplomacy 2.0” quite plainly shifts the balance away from short-term instrumentality. As I blogged about previously – in public diplomacy 2.0, the U.S. plays the role of facilitator and convener. The U.S. is a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

